ecotrust logo

Citizen of Salmon Nation

Fisheries iconMarine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative

Fisheries Uses and Values Project

Analysis and Evaluation of the Commercial Fishing Grounds

We propose using the same method of analysis developed in the NCCSR process regarding the creation of a weighted surface that represents the stated importance for each fishery. It has been noted in multiple reviews that this is a clever approach and one of the most novel features of our methods. In response to suggestions made in the SCCSR, we've modified our methods in the NCCSR by weighting respondents' values (pennies) by the proportion of in-sample ex-vessel landings (both by landing port and by fishery), rather than treating each participant's shape equally (fisherman A's 100 pennies is equal to fisherman B's 100 pennies). We propose to use this same method of weighting in the SCSR. This will give more weight to more experienced or more successful fishermen. This can be done by linking the fishing grounds to the landing receipts. This method has been reviewed and endorsed by commercial fishermen in the NCCSR.

  1. Process participants' raw shapefiles using automated analytical programs created in the other two regions to generate raster datasets of the fishing grounds.
  2. Evaluate measure of weighting
    1. Proportion of in-sample ex-vessel landings (both by landing port and by fishery)
    2. Data will be summarized in aggregate form, displaying the relative value based on in-sample landings or a crude measure of spatial distribution of gross value for each fishery as they were defined in Component 2.
    3. Results to be presented and reviewed
  3. Evaluate the fishing grounds based on the stratification of the sampled population to determine if its results influence or change the fishing footprint. Results will be used to inform the process on the potential impacts to different geographical groups and sectors of the fleet.
  4. The sample population within a fishery would be stratified based on the following individual criteria or a combination of:
    1. Landings and/or Ex-vessel revenues associated with the region (i.e., "highliners" vs. everybody else)
    2. Vessel size
    3. Home port vs. landing port
  5. Use and document additional information collected in the interviews to further define the stated importance of the participants' fishing grounds.
    1. Demographics
    2. Basic operational costs
    3. How far they travel to an area to fish
    4. Vessel and gear type
    5. Percentage of household income derived from fishing, and the proportion attributed to each fishery in which they participate.

Our Work

Community-Based Fisheries Management

OCEAN

Marine Life Protection Act Initiative

Life-Cycle Assessment of Salmon Fisheries

 


Field Notes

California's Coastal Reserves by Daniel Etra, July 2007

 


Learn More

Ecotrust & MLPA Initiative

FAQ

FAQ (Dive & Spearfish Community)

Interview Process (commercial)

Interview Process (recreational)

Interview Sign-up (recreational)

Commercial Fishermen presentation (2.7mb pdf)

Recreational Fishermen presentation (4mb pdf)


Project Components:

1. Outreach and Education

2a. Survey Design (commercial)

2b. Survey Design (recreational)

3a. Data Collection
(commercial fleet)

3b. Data Collection
(recreational fleet)

4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control

5. Analysis and Evaluation of the Commercial Fishing Grounds

6. Analysis and Evaluation of the Recreational Fishing Grounds

7. Socioeconomic Impact Analysis: Commercial Fleet

8. Socioeconomic Impact Analysis: Recreational Fleet

9. When Can the Data be Used by the Stakeholder

10. Customize Outputs to the Needs of the Users


Central Coast Final Report:

What we did in the central coast region: Commercial fishing grounds and their relative importance off the Central Coast of California (770k pdf)


NCC Presentations:

Commercial Fishing Grounds and Socioeconomic Data Collection: Draft Report and Maps, NCC Regional Stakeholder Meeting, 16 October 2007

Recreational Fishing Grounds and Values Data Collection: Status Report, NCC Regional Stakeholder Meeting, 16 October 2007


Reviews of our report:

Discussion of Ecotrust Methodology in: "Commercial fishing grounds and their relative importance off the Central Coast of California" by James Wilen & Josh Abbott (285k pdf)

An Assessment of Ecotrust's Relative Importance Indicators: Comparisons with Logbook Data for the Market Squid Fishery by James Wilen & Josh Abbott (360k pdf)

Peer Review: Ecotrust MLPAI Products by Bonnie J. McCay, Caroline Pomeroy, Kevin St. Martin, & coordinated by Barbara L. E. Walker (1.2mb pdf)

Our response to CFC review: Response to CFC Review of Ecotrust's MLPAI Products by Astrid Scholz (74k pdf)

CA Dept Fish & Game MLPA website

Place Matters: Geospatial Tools for Marine Science, Conservation, and Management in the Pacific Northwest

 

 

donate
Donate now
Your contribution provides essential funding.

 

Contact

Astrid Scholz
Vice President
Knowledge Systems
tel: 503.467.0758
Download vCard Astrid Scholz CV

Charles Steinback
Senior GIS Analyst
tel: 503.467.0777
Download vCard

Jon Bonkoski
GIS Analyst
tel: 503.467.0804
Download vCard

Sarah Kruse
Senior Economist
tel: 503.467.0785
Download vCard Sarah Kruse CV